{"id":1396,"date":"2025-05-27T21:01:22","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T21:01:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/"},"modified":"2025-05-27T21:01:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T21:01:22","slug":"dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/","title":{"rendered":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"TOC\">\n<h3>Table of Contents<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#grundlagen\">BV Netherlands vs. Cyprus Limited: The Essentials for German Entrepreneurs<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#bv-vorteile\">Tax Advantages of the Dutch BV for Holding Structures<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#zypern-limited\">Cypriot Limited: EU Benefits and Tax Optimization in Depth<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#holdings-vergleich\">Comparing Holding Structures: Practical Application for SMEs<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#rechtliche-rahmen\">Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#kosten-aufwand\">Costs and Effort: What Awaits You?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#empfehlung\">My Recommendation: Which Structure Suits Which Entrepreneur Type?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#faq\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<section>\n<p>You\u2019re facing one of the most important decisions of your entrepreneurial career. The right holding structure can save you, as a German SME owner, five to six figures every year. But here\u2019s the thing: Most entrepreneurs make this call based on gut feeling.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s an expensive mistake.<\/p>\n<p>I see successful entrepreneurs grappling daily with the choice between the Dutch BV and the Cypriot Limited. Both structures offer significant tax benefits over Germany. But which one truly fits your business model?<\/p>\n<p>As someone who has built various international structures myself, I can tell you: success or failure lies in the details. That\u2019s why today, I\u2019ll take you on an in-depth journey through both options.<\/p>\n<p>Forget superficial comparisons. We\u2019ll look at the real tax implications, legal pitfalls, and practical implementation. By the end, you\u2019ll know exactly which structure is optimal for your situation.<\/p>\n<p>Ready for this crucial decision?<\/p>\n<p>Yours, RMS<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"grundlagen\">\n<h2>BV Netherlands vs. Cyprus Limited: The Essentials for German Entrepreneurs<\/h2>\n<p>Before diving into the tax details, let\u2019s clarify the basics. The Dutch BV (Besloten Vennootschap) is the Netherlands\u2019 equivalent of the German GmbH. The Cypriot Limited Company corresponds to the British Limited.<\/p>\n<p>Both types of company are excellent for holding structures. That means: you hold shares in other businesses and receive dividends, royalties, or capital gains.<\/p>\n<h3>Why use a foreign holding structure at all?<\/h3>\n<p>The answer is simple: German corporations pay about 30% tax on profits. On top comes a 26.375% withholding tax on dividends. For larger distributions, that quickly adds up to more than 50% total tax burden.<\/p>\n<p>A well-structured holding company in the Netherlands or Cyprus can significantly reduce that burden. But \u2013 and this is important \u2013 only if implemented correctly and all substance requirements are met.<\/p>\n<h3>EU Directives as a Gamechanger<\/h3>\n<p>Both the Netherlands and Cyprus are EU member states. This gives them access to crucial EU directives:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Parent-Subsidiary Directive:<\/strong> Dividends between EU companies are generally exempt from withholding tax<\/li>\n<li><strong>Interest and Royalties Directive:<\/strong> Interest and royalties flow within the EU free of withholding tax<\/li>\n<li><strong>Merger Directive:<\/strong> Restructurings can be carried out tax neutrally<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These directives are why EU-holding structures are often superior to third-country locations like Dubai or Singapore. Both countries also have attractive double taxation agreements with Germany.<\/p>\n<h3>Substance Requirements: The Critical Success Factor<\/h3>\n<p>This is where things get serious. Both structures only work if you can prove real economic substance. This means:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Requirement<\/th>\n<th>Netherlands BV<\/th>\n<th>Cyprus Limited<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Management on site<\/td>\n<td>At least 50% of decisions<\/td>\n<td>Majority of board decisions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Office\/Premises<\/td>\n<td>Appropriate business premises<\/td>\n<td>Physical office required<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Local staff<\/td>\n<td>Depending on activity, 1\u20133 employees<\/td>\n<td>At least 1 qualified employee<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual accounts<\/td>\n<td>According to Dutch standards<\/td>\n<td>According to international standards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>These substance requirements aren\u2019t bureaucratic hurdles. They\u2019re your protection against future disputes with the German tax authorities. Cut corners here, and you\u2019ll pay double later.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"bv-vorteile\">\n<h2>Tax Advantages of the Dutch BV for Holding Structures<\/h2>\n<p>The Netherlands have established themselves over decades as a leading holding location \u2013 and that\u2019s no accident. The Dutch tax system offers several attractive features for holding activities.<\/p>\n<h3>Participation Exemption: The Golden Route for Dividends<\/h3>\n<p>The Dutch participation exemption (deelnemingsvrijstelling) is at the heart of any BV holding structure. Dividends and capital gains from qualified holdings are 100% tax exempt.<\/p>\n<p>What counts as a \u201cqualified holding\u201d? You must hold at least 5% of the shares. It must also be more than just a passive financial investment\u2014which is usually not an issue for active business holdings.<\/p>\n<p>Sample calculation: Your German subsidiary distributes \u20ac500,000 in dividends. A German holding GmbH would pay 26.375% withholding tax\u2014\u20ac131,875. The Dutch BV? Zero euros tax.<\/p>\n<h3>Corporate Tax: 25.8% on Operating Profits<\/h3>\n<p>Operating profits of the BV are subject to Dutch corporate tax. The standard rate is 25.8% (as of 2024). For the first \u20ac200,000 in profit, a reduced rate of 19% applies.<\/p>\n<p>This may not sound spectacular. But in practice, pure holding companies often generate only negligible operating profits. The main income comes from tax-free dividends and capital gains.<\/p>\n<h3>Withholding Tax on Outbound Dividends<\/h3>\n<p>Now it gets interesting. The Netherlands usually charges 15% withholding tax on outbound dividends. But for German shareholders, the double taxation treaty reduces this to 5%.<\/p>\n<p>Better still: If, as a German private individual, you hold less than 5% of the BV and correctly declare this in Germany, you can fully credit the Dutch withholding tax towards your German tax liability.<\/p>\n<h3>Advance Tax Rulings: Legal Certainty for Complex Structures<\/h3>\n<p>The Dutch tax authorities offer so-called Advance Tax Rulings (ATRs). With these, you can obtain binding clarification in advance of how certain transactions will be treated for tax purposes.<\/p>\n<p>These rulings are worth their weight in gold, providing legal certainty for the next five years. This is invaluable, especially for more complex holding structures with multiple levels.<\/p>\n<p>The cost of an ATR is about \u20ac15,000\u201325,000. Sounds expensive, but for larger structures, it\u2019s money well spent.<\/p>\n<h3>Innovation Box: Additional Advantages for IP-Intensive Companies<\/h3>\n<p>If your group develops intellectual property, the Dutch Innovation Box offers additional advantages. Licensing revenues from self-developed patents, software, or know-how are taxed at only an effective 9% rate.<\/p>\n<p>This scheme also works through holding structures. Your German development company transfers the IP to the Dutch BV, which then licenses it out to the operating companies.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"zypern-limited\">\n<h2>Cypriot Limited: EU Benefits and Tax Optimization in Depth<\/h2>\n<p>Cyprus is the hidden star among EU holding jurisdictions. While the Netherlands has traditionally attracted large corporations, Cyprus also offers significant advantages for medium-sized structures.<\/p>\n<h3>Corporate Tax: 12.5% \u2013 But Only on Certain Profits<\/h3>\n<p>The Cypriot corporate tax rate of 12.5% is already much more attractive than Germany\u2019s 30%. But that\u2019s just the beginning. There are far-reaching exemptions for holding activities.<\/p>\n<p>The following income is tax-free:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Dividends from domestic and foreign holdings (no minimum shareholding required)<\/li>\n<li>Capital gains from sales of shares in corporations<\/li>\n<li>Permanently held securities<\/li>\n<li>Interest income from long-term loans to subsidiaries<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In practice, a Cypriot holding limited pays virtually zero tax on its typical income in Cyprus.<\/p>\n<h3>Intellectual Property Box: Even More Attractive Than the Netherlands<\/h3>\n<p>The Cypriot IP Box is one of the most attractive in Europe. Licensing income from IP is effectively taxed at just 2.5%\u2014less than half the Dutch Innovation Box.<\/p>\n<p>The qualification requirements are also less strict. It\u2019s sufficient for the IP rights to have been developed or significantly improved in Cyprus. Complete new development is not required.<\/p>\n<h3>No Withholding Tax on Outbound Dividends<\/h3>\n<p>Here, Cyprus has a distinct advantage over the Netherlands. Cypriot companies generally do not levy withholding tax on outbound dividends. This simplifies structures and reduces the overall tax burden.<\/p>\n<p>For German shareholders, this means: dividends flow back to Germany untaxed, where they are then taxed according to German law.<\/p>\n<h3>Defense Levy: The Hidden Cost Factor<\/h3>\n<p>But beware: Cyprus imposes a Defense Levy of 17% on interest, dividends, and rents received by Cyprus residents. This also affects Cypriot companies.<\/p>\n<p>This only applies, however, to dividends from Cypriot companies paid to Cypriot shareholders. For German shareholders or holding structures, this is generally not relevant.<\/p>\n<h3>Notional Interest Deduction: Imputed Interest Expense on Equity<\/h3>\n<p>Cyprus offers a unique rule: the Notional Interest Deduction (NID). This lets you deduct imputed interest on your equity as a business expense. The rate is based on the 10-year government bond plus 5%.<\/p>\n<p>With larger amounts of equity, this can reduce the already low tax burden even further\u2014and sometimes even leads to tax losses that can be carried forward to future years.<\/p>\n<h3>Double Taxation Agreements: Cyprus\u2019s Hidden Ace<\/h3>\n<p>Cyprus has one of the most extensive double taxation networks in the world, with over 60 countries\u2014including key jurisdictions like the UAE, Russia, and India.<\/p>\n<p>This also makes Cypriot holding companies attractive for global structures that stretch beyond Europe.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"holdings-vergleich\">\n<h2>Comparing Holding Structures: Practical Application for SMEs<\/h2>\n<p>Theory is all well and good. But what do these structures look like in practice? Let me show you three typical SME scenarios.<\/p>\n<h3>Scenario 1: Software Company with \u20ac2 Million Annual Profit<\/h3>\n<p>Let\u2019s say you run a successful software business. Your German GmbH generates \u20ac2 million in profit each year, and you wish to pay out \u20ac1.5 million in dividends.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Status Quo (Germany):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Corporate tax: 2,000,000 \u00d7 30% = \u20ac600,000<\/li>\n<li>Withholding tax: 1,400,000 \u00d7 26.375% = \u20ac369,250<\/li>\n<li>Net retained: \u20ac1,030,750<\/li>\n<li>Total tax burden: 48.5%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>With a Dutch BV:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>German GmbH distributes to BV (no German withholding tax with &gt; 10% shareholding)<\/li>\n<li>BV pays 5% Dutch withholding tax: 1,400,000 \u00d7 5% = \u20ac70,000<\/li>\n<li>When distributed to you: 1,330,000 \u00d7 26.375% = \u20ac350,838<\/li>\n<li>Net retained: \u20ac979,162<\/li>\n<li>Saving: \u20ac51,588 per year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>With a Cypriot Limited:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Dividend to Cypriot Limited is tax-free<\/li>\n<li>No Cypriot withholding tax<\/li>\n<li>When distributed to you: 1,400,000 \u00d7 26.375% = \u20ac369,250<\/li>\n<li>Net retained: \u20ac1,030,750<\/li>\n<li>Saving: Same as status quo, but EU flexibility for future structures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Scenario 2: Consulting Company with IP Licensing<\/h3>\n<p>You have developed a successful consulting methodology and license it to franchise partners. Annual license income: \u20ac800,000.<\/p>\n<p><strong>With Dutch BV (Innovation Box):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Effective tax: 800,000 \u00d7 9% = \u20ac72,000<\/li>\n<li>Upon distribution: additional 26.375% on net dividend<\/li>\n<li>Total burden: approx. 31%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>With Cypriot Limited (IP Box):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Effective tax: 800,000 \u00d7 2.5% = \u20ac20,000<\/li>\n<li>No withholding tax upon distribution<\/li>\n<li>Upon distribution: 26.375% on net dividend<\/li>\n<li>Total burden: approx. 28%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This showcases Cyprus\u2019s advantage for IP-heavy business models.<\/p>\n<h3>Scenario 3: Exit Planning for a Family Business<\/h3>\n<p>You\u2019re planning to sell your business in five years for \u20ac10 million, with a capital gain of \u20ac8 million.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Without a holding structure:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Privileged taxation under \u00a7 16 EStG: approx. 30% on capital gain<\/li>\n<li>Tax burden: \u20ac2.4 million<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>With a holding structure (Netherlands or Cyprus):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Shares held by the holding company<\/li>\n<li>Sale proceeds are tax-free (participation exemption or Cypriot exemption)<\/li>\n<li>Tax burden: \u20ac0 at the holding level<\/li>\n<li>German taxes only arise when you distribute to yourself<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This offers maximum flexibility. You can choose when to distribute and use tax planning options.<\/p>\n<h3>When Does Each Structure Make Sense?<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Dutch BV is suitable for:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Larger holding structures with several subsidiaries<\/li>\n<li>International corporate groups<\/li>\n<li>Companies with complex financing arrangements<\/li>\n<li>Long-term family wealth planning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Cypriot Limited is suitable for:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>IP-heavy business models<\/li>\n<li>Simpler holding structures<\/li>\n<li>Companies with non-EU activity<\/li>\n<li>Cost-conscious SMEs<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"rechtliche-rahmen\">\n<h2>Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements<\/h2>\n<p>This is where the wheat is separated from the chaff. Both structures only work if you take legal requirements seriously. Sloppy implementation leads to costly discussions with the tax authorities.<\/p>\n<h3>Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) Taxation: The German Sword of Damocles<\/h3>\n<p>Germany\u2019s CFC rules (\u00a7\u00a7 7-14 AStG) are your biggest adversary. They apply if the foreign company qualifies as an \u201cintermediate company.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This applies if:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>German shareholders hold more than 50% of the shares AND<\/li>\n<li>The foreign company generates more than 30% passive income AND<\/li>\n<li>The foreign tax burden is less than 25%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>With both structures, you must therefore actively avoid your holding company being viewed as a mere \u201cletterbox company.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Substance Requirements in Detail<\/h3>\n<p><strong>For the Dutch BV:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Dutch authorities have defined clear substance requirements. You must prove:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Qualified management:<\/strong> At least one qualified local director<\/li>\n<li><strong>Appropriate staffing:<\/strong> Depending on complexity, 1\u20133 full-time equivalents<\/li>\n<li><strong>Adequate business premises:<\/strong> Own or long-term leased office space<\/li>\n<li><strong>Local accounting:<\/strong> Complete bookkeeping per Dutch standards<\/li>\n<li><strong>Board meetings on site:<\/strong> Majority of decisions made in the Netherlands<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>For the Cypriot Limited:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cyprus has similar, in some ways more flexible, requirements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Management residency:<\/strong> Majority of directors must reside in Cyprus OR management is controlled from Cyprus<\/li>\n<li><strong>Physical presence:<\/strong> Offices and communication facilities on site<\/li>\n<li><strong>Local personnel:<\/strong> At least one qualified employee with appropriate authority<\/li>\n<li><strong>Annual compliance:<\/strong> Annual accounts, tax returns, and registration confirmation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Economic Substance Regulations<\/h3>\n<p>Both EU countries have tightened their economic substance regulations in response to international criticism. For holding activities, this means:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Requirement<\/th>\n<th>Netherlands<\/th>\n<th>Cyprus<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Minimum activities<\/td>\n<td>Strategic decisions on site<\/td>\n<td>Supervision and control of holdings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Local staff<\/td>\n<td>Full-time equivalent per \u20ac10 million assets managed<\/td>\n<td>Appropriate to the structure\u2019s complexity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operating expenses<\/td>\n<td>Appropriate to the scope of activities<\/td>\n<td>Market-based remuneration for services<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Documentation<\/td>\n<td>Detailed records of all decisions<\/td>\n<td>Annual report on economic activities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>German Reporting Requirements<\/h3>\n<p>As a German shareholder, you must observe extensive reporting obligations:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Foreign Tax Act Declarations:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Shareholding &gt; 10% in foreign companies<\/li>\n<li>Annual reporting by 31 July of the following year<\/li>\n<li>Include: annual financial statements of the foreign entity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Foreign capital income:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Dividends and capital gains in the tax return<\/li>\n<li>Offset of foreign withholding tax<\/li>\n<li>Proof of proper taxation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you miss these reports, you risk steep penalties.<\/p>\n<h3>Anti-Treaty Shopping Regulations<\/h3>\n<p>Both the Netherlands and Cyprus have updated their double taxation treaties to include anti-treaty shopping clauses designed to prevent treaty abuse.<\/p>\n<p>The key element is the \u201cPrincipal Purpose Test\u201d: If the main purpose of a structure is to obtain treaty benefits, they can be denied.<\/p>\n<p>This is why it\u2019s vital that your holding structure has genuine economic reasons\u2014pure tax saving is not enough.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"kosten-aufwand\">\n<h2>Costs and Effort: What Awaits You?<\/h2>\n<p>Let\u2019s be blunt. A professional holding structure costs money. Trying to save here will cost you twice as much down the line. So let me show you the actual costs for both options.<\/p>\n<h3>Comparison of Incorporation Costs<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cost Item<\/th>\n<th>Dutch BV<\/th>\n<th>Cypriot Limited<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Minimum capital<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac0.01 (practically \u20ac18,000 recommended)<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac1,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Notary fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac800\u20131,200<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac500\u2013800<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Registration fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac50<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac350<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Advisory fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac8,000\u201315,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac5,000\u201310,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Advance Tax Ruling<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac15,000\u201325,000 (optional)<\/td>\n<td>Not available<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total without ATR<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac9,000\u201317,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac6,000\u201312,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Advisory fees vary greatly depending on how complex your structure is. For simple holdings, you\u2019re at the low end. Complex, multi-jurisdictional structures can get much costlier.<\/p>\n<h3>Ongoing Annual Costs<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Dutch BV:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tax firm:<\/strong> \u20ac8,000\u201315,000 for annual accounts and tax return<\/li>\n<li><strong>On-site management:<\/strong> \u20ac25,000\u201340,000 (depending on complexity)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Office costs:<\/strong> \u20ac3,000\u20138,000 (depending on location and size)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Other costs:<\/strong> \u20ac2,000\u20135,000 (insurance, licenses, etc.)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Total:<\/strong> \u20ac38,000\u201368,000 per year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Cypriot Limited:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tax firm:<\/strong> \u20ac5,000\u201310,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>On-site management:<\/strong> \u20ac15,000\u201325,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Office costs:<\/strong> \u20ac2,000\u20135,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Other costs:<\/strong> \u20ac1,500\u20133,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Total:<\/strong> \u20ac23,500\u201343,000 per year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These numbers may look high\u2014but keep in mind: With annual tax savings of \u20ac100,000, your costs pay off in just a few months.<\/p>\n<h3>Break-Even Analysis: When Does Each Structure Pay Off?<\/h3>\n<p>As a rule of thumb:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cypriot Limited pays off starting at:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u20ac200,000 annual dividends, or<\/li>\n<li>Capital gains &gt; \u20ac1 million, or<\/li>\n<li>License income &gt; \u20ac150,000 annually<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Dutch BV pays off starting at:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u20ac400,000 annual dividends, or<\/li>\n<li>More complex holding structures with several tiers, or<\/li>\n<li>Long-term wealth accumulation &gt; \u20ac5 million<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Below these thresholds, the running costs often outweigh tax savings. In that case, stick to simpler solutions.<\/p>\n<h3>Avoiding Hidden Costs<\/h3>\n<p>In my experience, there are common cost traps:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Insufficient substance:<\/strong> Cutting corners on staff or office costs risks disputes with authorities\u2014quickly adding \u20ac50,000\u2013100,000 in additional legal fees.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bad tax advice:<\/strong> I\u2019ve seen structures set up completely wrong. The fix cost more than a new structure from scratch.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Poor documentation:<\/strong> Incomplete paperwork leads to expensive retroactive work. Especially during tax audits, this gets expensive fast.<\/p>\n<p>So my advice: Invest in professional implementation from the outset. You\u2019ll save a ton of money and stress in the long run.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"empfehlung\">\n<h2>My Recommendation: Which Structure Suits Which Entrepreneur Type?<\/h2>\n<p>After 15 years\u2019 experience with international tax structures, I can tell you: There\u2019s no such thing as the \u201cperfect\u201d solution. There\u2019s only the optimal solution for your unique situation.<\/p>\n<p>Let me share my decision matrix:<\/p>\n<h3>You\u2019re the \u201cPragmatist\u201d: Cypriot Limited<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Your Profile:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Annual profit between \u20ac200,000\u20131,000,000<\/li>\n<li>Simple to mid-sized corporate structure<\/li>\n<li>You want maximum tax savings with minimum complexity<\/li>\n<li>IP components in your business model<\/li>\n<li>Costs should remain manageable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Why Cyprus is right for you:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Cypriot Limited offers you the best value-for-money. With annual costs around \u20ac25,000\u201335,000, you can achieve tax savings of \u20ac50,000\u2013200,000 or more every year. The structure is straightforward, and EU membership provides legal certainty.<\/p>\n<p>You also benefit from the CY IP Box with only 2.5% tax on licensing revenue\u2014a major plus if you have developed software, know-how, or trademarks.<\/p>\n<h3>You\u2019re the \u201cStrategist\u201d: Dutch BV<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Your Profile:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Annual profits &gt; \u20ac1,000,000<\/li>\n<li>Complex or planned group structures<\/li>\n<li>Long-term family wealth or succession planning<\/li>\n<li>International operations beyond the EU<\/li>\n<li>You don\u2019t shy away from higher upfront investment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Why the Netherlands is right for you:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Dutch BV is the gold standard for larger holding structures. The extensive DTT network, the option of Advance Tax Rulings, and centuries of experience as a holding location make it the first choice for complex structures.<\/p>\n<p>Especially for company values &gt; \u20ac10 million or planned exits, the Dutch participation exemption offers unbeatable benefits.<\/p>\n<h3>You\u2019re the \u201cDigital Pro\u201d: Flexible Approach<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Your Profile:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Digital business with a global outlook<\/li>\n<li>Rapid growth, but uncertain future prospects<\/li>\n<li>You already work internationally<\/li>\n<li>High IP share (software, online courses, etc.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>My recommendation for you:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Start with a Cypriot Limited for IP exploitation. This gives you immediate tax advantages at manageable cost. As you grow, you can later add a Dutch BV as a parent holding on top.<\/p>\n<p>This staged approach minimizes your risk and maximizes your flexibility.<\/p>\n<h3>You\u2019re the \u201cCautious One\u201d: Optimize Germany<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Your Profile:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Annual profit &lt; \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<li>You shy away from complex international structures<\/li>\n<li>Strongly rooted in your region<\/li>\n<li>Want to keep compliance workload low<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>My honest recommendation:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For now, stay in Germany. Optimize through provisions, company pension schemes, and other legal options. A foreign holding structure would eat up your savings.<\/p>\n<p>Review the situation if your profits consistently exceed \u20ac300,000.<\/p>\n<h3>Timing is Crucial<\/h3>\n<p>One key aspect many overlook: Timing your structuring correctly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Optimal:<\/strong> Before your next major growth phase or a planned exit. Structures are most effective with future profits.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Challenging:<\/strong> Retroactive optimization of existing structures. Here, your planning options are often limited.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Too late:<\/strong> Just before an exit or when an audit is imminent. This looks like a last-minute tax dodge.<\/p>\n<h3>My Three Most Important Tips<\/h3>\n<p><strong>1. Think in lifecycles, not quarters<\/strong><br \/> A holding structure is a long-term decision. The upfront investment usually pays off after 2\u20133 years. After that, you\u2019ll benefit for decades.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Substance is non-negotiable<\/strong><br \/> No matter which structure you choose: invest in real substance. That \u20ac30,000\u201350,000 a year is money well spent.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. Plan exit strategies from the start<\/strong><br \/> Both structures offer flexibility for the future\u2014but only if you plan ahead. Restructuring afterwards is always more expensive.<\/p>\n<p>Still have questions about your specific situation? The decision between Dutch BV and Cypriot Limited is complex. But with the right advice, you\u2019ll find the optimal solution for your needs.<\/p>\n<p>Yours, RMS<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"faq\">\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Can I combine both structures?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes\u2014in fact, this makes a lot of sense for larger groups. A Dutch BV as top holding and a Cypriot Limited for IP exploitation work together perfectly, allowing you to leverage the benefits of both systems.<\/p>\n<h3>How long does it take to set up a BV or Limited?<\/h3>\n<p>A Cypriot Limited is operational within 2\u20133 weeks. For the Dutch BV, allow 4\u20136 weeks. For complex setups with an Advance Tax Ruling, it could take 3\u20134 months.<\/p>\n<h3>Do I need to be personally on site?<\/h3>\n<p>No, but regular presence helps support the substance argument. 4\u20136 visits per year for board meetings and strategic decisions are advisable. However, everything can also be organized digitally.<\/p>\n<h3>What happens in Brexit-like scenarios?<\/h3>\n<p>Both countries are stable EU members. The risk of EU exit is virtually zero. Nevertheless, you should include exit clauses in your contracts as a precaution.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I convert my existing German GmbH?<\/h3>\n<p>A direct conversion is complicated and rarely sensible. Usually, a merger of the German GmbH into a new holding structure is the better way. This can be done tax-neutrally but requires careful planning.<\/p>\n<h3>How can I ensure substance cost-effectively?<\/h3>\n<p>Use corporate service providers offering package solutions. An experienced provider can handle management, bookkeeping, and office service for \u20ac20,000\u201330,000 a year. That\u2019s cheaper than setting up your own structures.<\/p>\n<h3>What about the planned EU minimum tax?<\/h3>\n<p>The EU minimum tax of 15% only affects groups with revenues above \u20ac750 million. For SME structures, its irrelevant. Even if expanded, both countries offer enough operational flexibility.<\/p>\n<h3>Are these structures still legal after the BEPS initiative?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, as long as you can demonstrate genuine economic activity. BEPS targets aggressive tax planning by multinationals\u2014not legitimate SME holding structures with real substance.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents BV Netherlands vs. Cyprus Limited: The Essentials for German Entrepreneurs Tax Advantages of the Dutch BV for Holding Structures Cypriot Limited: EU Benefits and Tax Optimization in Depth Comparing Holding Structures: Practical Application for SMEs Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements Costs and Effort: What Awaits You? My Recommendation: Which Structure Suits Which [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_tldr":"<ul>\n<li><strong>Niederl\u00e4ndische BV:<\/strong> Ideal f\u00fcr komplexe Holdings-Strukturen ab 1 Mio. \u20ac Jahresgewinn, bietet 100% steuerfreie Dividenden durch Participation Exemption und Advance Tax Rulings f\u00fcr Rechtssicherheit<\/li>\n<li><strong>Zypriotische Limited:<\/strong> Kosteneffizient f\u00fcr mittelst\u00e4ndische Strukturen ab 200.000\u20ac Gewinn, 12,5% K\u00f6rperschaftsteuer, keine Quellensteuer auf Dividenden und attraktive 2,5% IP Box<\/li>\n<li><strong>EU-Vorteile:<\/strong> Beide Strukturen nutzen Mutter-Tochter-Richtlinie f\u00fcr quellensteuerfreie Dividenden und bieten umfangreiche Doppelbesteuerungsabkommen<\/li>\n<li><strong>Substanzanforderungen:<\/strong> Echte Gesch\u00e4ftst\u00e4tigkeit vor Ort mit qualifiziertem Personal, B\u00fcror\u00e4umen und lokaler Gesch\u00e4ftsf\u00fchrung zwingend erforderlich f\u00fcr steuerliche Anerkennung<\/li>\n<li><strong>Kostenrahmen:<\/strong> Niederl\u00e4ndische BV kostet 38.000-68.000\u20ac j\u00e4hrlich, zypriotische Limited 23.500-43.000\u20ac - Break-Even ab 200.000-400.000\u20ac Dividenden<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compliance:<\/strong> Umfangreiche deutsche Meldepflichten und Anti-Treaty Shopping Regelungen erfordern professionelle Betreuung und dokumentierte wirtschaftliche Gr\u00fcnde<\/li>\n<li><strong>Empfehlung:<\/strong> Zypern f\u00fcr pragmatische Mittelst\u00e4ndler mit IP-Komponenten, Niederlande f\u00fcr strategische Holdings-Strukturen und langfristige Verm\u00f6gensplanung<\/li>\n<\/ul>","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nicht-kategorisiert"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Table of Contents BV Netherlands vs. Cyprus Limited: The Essentials for German Entrepreneurs Tax Advantages of the Dutch BV for Holding Structures Cypriot Limited: EU Benefits and Tax Optimization in Depth Comparing Holding Structures: Practical Application for SMEs Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements Costs and Effort: What Awaits You? My Recommendation: Which Structure Suits Which [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\"},\"headline\":\"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3294,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Nicht kategorisiert\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/\",\"name\":\"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","og_description":"Table of Contents BV Netherlands vs. Cyprus Limited: The Essentials for German Entrepreneurs Tax Advantages of the Dutch BV for Holding Structures Cypriot Limited: EU Benefits and Tax Optimization in Depth Comparing Holding Structures: Practical Application for SMEs Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements Costs and Effort: What Awaits You? My Recommendation: Which Structure Suits Which [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/","og_site_name":"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","article_published_time":"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239"},"headline":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages","datePublished":"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/"},"wordCount":3294,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Nicht kategorisiert"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/","url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/","name":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-27T21:01:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/dutch-bv-vs-cypriot-limited-holding-structures-for-german-smes-tax-and-legal-advantages-and-disadvantages\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dutch BV vs. Cypriot Limited: Holding Structures for German SMEs \u2013 Tax and Legal Advantages and Disadvantages"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/","name":"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}