{"id":954,"date":"2025-05-27T19:15:43","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T19:15:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/"},"modified":"2025-05-27T19:15:43","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T19:15:43","slug":"malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/","title":{"rendered":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<div id=\"TOC\">\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#malta-vs-irland-standort\">Malta vs. Ireland: Which EU Location Suits Your Company?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#malta-eu-hauptsitz\">Malta as EU Headquarters: The 6\/7ths Rule and Other Tax Advantages<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#irland-ip-holdings\">Ireland: The Preferred EU Hub for Tech Giants and IP Holdings<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#holding-strukturen\">Holding Structures for Companies with 10+ Million Euro Turnover<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#praktische-umsetzung\">Practical Implementation: From Planning to Execution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#compliance-substance\">Compliance and Substance Requirements in Malta and Ireland<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#kostenvergleich-roi\">Cost Comparison and ROI Calculation for Both Locations<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>Recently, I sat down with a client whose software company had just crossed the 15-million-euro mark.<\/p>\n<p>His question was simple: \u201cRichard, should I choose Malta or Ireland?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>My answer surprised him:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt depends on whether you love dividends or prefer IP structures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This is, in fact, the core difference between Malta and Ireland. Malta shines with its famous 6\/7ths rule on dividend distributions. Ireland, on the other hand, is the gold standard for intellectual property holdings and complex group structures.<\/p>\n<p>But let me be honest with you:<\/p>\n<p>Both countries have their merits. The only question is: Which location fits <em>your<\/em> business model and <em>your<\/em> long-term goals?<\/p>\n<p>In this article, I\u2019ll take you on a detailed journey through both EU locations. We\u2019ll look not just at tax rates, but also at practical aspects\u2014from substance requirements to setup costs.<\/p>\n<p>Because I can promise you one thing: After reading this article, you\u2019ll know exactly which location is right for your business.<\/p>\n<p>Ready? Then let\u2019s develop your optimal EU headquarters strategy\u2014together.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"malta-vs-irland-standort\">Malta vs. Ireland: Which EU Location Suits Your Company?<\/h2>\n<p>Before we get into the details, I want to dispel a common myth:<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not about where you pay the lowest tax.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s about where you can build the best <strong>overall structure<\/strong> for your company.<\/p>\n<h3>The Fundamental Differences at a Glance<\/h3>\n<p>Malta and Ireland follow completely different tax philosophies. This is crucial to understand.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Aspect<\/th>\n<th>Malta<\/th>\n<th>Ireland<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Corporate Tax<\/td>\n<td>35% (effectively 5% via 6\/7ths rule)<\/td>\n<td>12.5% on trading profits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Specialization<\/td>\n<td>Dividend-optimized structures<\/td>\n<td>IP holdings and licensing structures<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minimum Substance<\/td>\n<td>Moderate requirements<\/td>\n<td>Higher substance expectations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Setup Complexity<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>International Recognition<\/td>\n<td>Good in EU<\/td>\n<td>Excellent worldwide<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Who is Malta the Better Location For?<\/h3>\n<p>Malta is ideal for entrepreneurs with the following priorities:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Regular dividend distributions:<\/strong> The 6\/7ths rule makes Malta unbeatable for profit payouts<\/li>\n<li><strong>Simple structures:<\/strong> You don\u2019t want overly complicated constructs<\/li>\n<li><strong>EU focus:<\/strong> Your business is mainly Europe-centered<\/li>\n<li><strong>Moderate compliance requirements:<\/strong> You prefer less bureaucracy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>When Should You Choose Ireland?<\/h3>\n<p>Ireland is the better choice if you meet these criteria:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>IP-heavy business models:<\/strong> Software, patents, trademarks are your core assets<\/li>\n<li><strong>Global ambitions:<\/strong> You want to expand outside the EU<\/li>\n<li><strong>Complex group structures:<\/strong> You need sophisticated holding arrangements<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tech companies:<\/strong> You develop or license technology<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>By the way: Many of my clients combine both locations. Malta for operational activities, Ireland for IP holdings. This is absolutely doable and often the optimal solution.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"malta-eu-hauptsitz\">Malta as EU Headquarters: The 6\/7ths Rule and Other Tax Advantages<\/h2>\n<p>Let me explain Malta\u2019s tax structure\u2014in a way that\u2019s truly clear.<\/p>\n<p>The Maltese system operates under the so-called \u201cFull Imputation System.\u201d In other words: corporate tax paid is fully credited to the personal tax liability.<\/p>\n<h3>How the Famous 6\/7ths Rule Works<\/h3>\n<p>This is where it gets interesting. Malta first levies 35% corporate tax on all profits.<\/p>\n<p>But: When dividends are paid to non-Maltese shareholders, you get back 6\/7 of the tax paid.<\/p>\n<p>A practical example:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Your company earns \u20ac100,000 profit<\/li>\n<li>Malta takes \u20ac35,000 in corporate tax<\/li>\n<li>When dividends are distributed, you get \u20ac30,000 back (6\/7 of \u20ac35,000)<\/li>\n<li>Effective tax burden: \u20ac5,000 or 5%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>It\u2019s brilliantly simple\u2014and 100% legal.<\/p>\n<h3>Other Tax Advantages in Malta<\/h3>\n<p>The 6\/7ths rule is just the tip of the iceberg. Malta also offers these benefits:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>No withholding tax:<\/strong> On dividends, interest and royalties to EU shareholders<\/li>\n<li><strong>Participation exemption:<\/strong> Profits from shareholdings are tax-exempt<\/li>\n<li><strong>Extensive DTA network:<\/strong> Over 70 double taxation treaties<\/li>\n<li><strong>EU single market access:<\/strong> Full access to all EU markets<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>When Does Malta Make No Sense?<\/h3>\n<p>I value honesty. So I\u2019ll say when Malta is not optimal:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>You always retain all profits (then the 6\/7ths rule doesn\u2019t help)<\/li>\n<li>Your business is very IP-heavy (Ireland is better here)<\/li>\n<li>You need maximum international reputation (US markets often prefer Ireland)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Practical Considerations for Malta<\/h3>\n<p>When planning for Malta, keep these points in mind:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Area<\/th>\n<th>Requirement<\/th>\n<th>Effort<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Minimum capital<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac1,165<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Local director<\/td>\n<td>Not mandatory<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Local office<\/td>\n<td>Recommended<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Accounting<\/td>\n<td>Required locally<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Substance<\/td>\n<td>Moderate requirements<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"irland-ip-holdings\">Ireland: The Preferred EU Hub for Tech Giants and IP Holdings<\/h2>\n<p>Why have Apple, Google, Facebook, and virtually every tech giant chosen Ireland?<\/p>\n<p>The answer is simple: Ireland is the world\u2019s best location for IP structures.<\/p>\n<h3>The Irish 12.5% Corporate Tax Rate: More Than Just a Low Rate<\/h3>\n<p>Ireland charges 12.5% corporate tax on trading profits. That\u2019s attractive, but not spectacular on its own.<\/p>\n<p>The real interest lies in the details:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Knowledge Development Box:<\/strong> Profits from qualified IP can be taxed at just 6.25%<\/li>\n<li><strong>R&amp;D credits:<\/strong> 25% tax credit on research expenses<\/li>\n<li><strong>Capital allowances:<\/strong> 100% write-off for certain IP investments<\/li>\n<li><strong>Holding regime:<\/strong> Ideal for complex group structures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>IP Structures in Ireland: The Gold Standard for Tech Companies<\/h3>\n<p>This is where Ireland shows its true strength. Let me explain a typical structure:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>IP holding in Ireland:<\/strong> Owns all valuable IP rights<\/li>\n<li><strong>Licensing:<\/strong> Licenses IP to operating companies worldwide<\/li>\n<li><strong>Profit shift:<\/strong> Profits flow to Ireland as license fees<\/li>\n<li><strong>Low taxation:<\/strong> 6.25% on qualified IP<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This is particularly effective for:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Software development companies<\/li>\n<li>Online platforms<\/li>\n<li>Technology licensors<\/li>\n<li>Research-driven companies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Substance Requirements in Ireland: What You Must Know<\/h3>\n<p>Ireland takes substance very seriously. That\u2019s great for reputation, but means higher requirements:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Requirement<\/th>\n<th>Minimum<\/th>\n<th>Recommended<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Local directors<\/td>\n<td>1 (for small companies)<\/td>\n<td>Board majority<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Employees<\/td>\n<td>Depends on activity<\/td>\n<td>2-5 qualified staff<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Office space<\/td>\n<td>Registered address<\/td>\n<td>Own office<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Board meetings<\/td>\n<td>At least 1 per year<\/td>\n<td>Quarterly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>When is Ireland the Wrong Choice?<\/h3>\n<p>Here too, I\u2019m honest with you:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Simple services:<\/strong> Without an IP component, Malta is often better<\/li>\n<li><strong>Low substance:<\/strong> You want minimal local presence<\/li>\n<li><strong>Purely EU activities:<\/strong> Malta may be more cost-effective<\/li>\n<li><strong>Immediate liquidity:<\/strong> Ireland\u2019s setup takes longer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"holding-strukturen\">Holding Structures for Companies with 10+ Million Euro Turnover<\/h2>\n<p>Once you surpass 10 million euro in turnover, the rules change fundamentally.<\/p>\n<p>Suddenly it\u2019s not just about tax optimization. It\u2019s about strategic group structures that set you up for the next 20 years.<\/p>\n<h3>The Classic Malta Holding Structure<\/h3>\n<p>Here is the proven Malta structure for larger companies:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Top holding (Malta):<\/strong> Holds all operating companies<\/li>\n<li><strong>Operating companies:<\/strong> In various EU countries depending on market<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dividend flow:<\/strong> All profits flow to Malta, with 6\/7ths tax refund<\/li>\n<li><strong>Personal level:<\/strong> You as shareholder receive tax-optimized dividends<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A real-life example from my practice:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>An e-commerce entrepreneur with \u20ac15 million in turnover operates companies in Germany, France, and Spain. His Malta holding receives \u20ac2 million in dividends annually. Thanks to the 6\/7ths rule, he pays just \u20ac100,000 in tax instead of \u20ac700,000.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>The Irish IP Holding Structure for Tech Companies<\/h3>\n<p>For tech-driven companies, this structure is often optimal:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>IP holding (Ireland):<\/strong> Develops and holds all IP rights<\/li>\n<li><strong>Marketing hub (Ireland):<\/strong> Central marketing and sales functions<\/li>\n<li><strong>Operating satellites:<\/strong> Local entities for customer care<\/li>\n<li><strong>License flow:<\/strong> IP is licensed at arm\u2019s length fees<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Hybrid Structures: The Best of Both Worlds<\/h3>\n<p>For very large companies, I often combine both locations:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Function<\/th>\n<th>Location<\/th>\n<th>Justification<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>IP development<\/td>\n<td>Ireland<\/td>\n<td>R&amp;D credits and Knowledge Development Box<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operational holding<\/td>\n<td>Malta<\/td>\n<td>6\/7ths rule for dividends<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Financing<\/td>\n<td>Ireland<\/td>\n<td>Better international recognition<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Profit distribution<\/td>\n<td>Malta<\/td>\n<td>Lowest effective burden<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Anti-Avoidance Rules: What To Watch Out For<\/h3>\n<p>With the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD), new rules are in force\u2014especially for larger structures:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>GAAR (General Anti-Avoidance Rule):<\/strong> Artificial structures are targeted<\/li>\n<li><strong>CFC rules:<\/strong> Controlled foreign corporations are scrutinized<\/li>\n<li><strong>Interest limitation rules:<\/strong> Deductibility of interest is restricted<\/li>\n<li><strong>Exit taxation:<\/strong> Emigration triggers exit tax<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>That\u2019s why real substance is more crucial than ever. Your structure must make genuine business sense, not just tax sense.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"praktische-umsetzung\">Practical Implementation: From Planning to Execution<\/h2>\n<p>Theory is fine. But how do you put this into practice?<\/p>\n<p>Here is my proven 6-phase method for larger companies:<\/p>\n<h3>Phase 1: Analysis &amp; Strategy Design (4-6 Weeks)<\/h3>\n<p>Before we set up anything, we thoroughly analyse your situation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Business model analysis:<\/strong> Where are your actual profits generated?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cashflow planning:<\/strong> When do you need which liquidity?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tax impact analysis:<\/strong> How much can you really save?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Risk assessment:<\/strong> What compliance risks exist?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Phase 2: Structure Planning &amp; Optimization (2-3 Weeks)<\/h3>\n<p>Now, we develop your tailored structure:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Location selection based on your business model<\/li>\n<li>Legal entity optimization for each entity<\/li>\n<li>Intercompany pricing strategy<\/li>\n<li>Substance planning at each location<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Phase 3: Formation &amp; Setup (6-12 Weeks)<\/h3>\n<p>The practical execution runs in parallel across several countries:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Activity<\/th>\n<th>Malta Timeline<\/th>\n<th>Ireland Timeline<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Company formation<\/td>\n<td>3-4 weeks<\/td>\n<td>4-6 weeks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Bank account opening<\/td>\n<td>2-4 weeks<\/td>\n<td>4-8 weeks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tax registration<\/td>\n<td>1-2 weeks<\/td>\n<td>2-3 weeks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Building substance<\/td>\n<td>4-6 weeks<\/td>\n<td>6-12 weeks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Phase 4: Migration &amp; Transfer (4-8 Weeks)<\/h3>\n<p>This is often the most critical part. Here we transfer existing activities:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Asset transfer:<\/strong> IP rights, shareholdings, other assets<\/li>\n<li><strong>Contract migration:<\/strong> Customer and supplier contracts<\/li>\n<li><strong>Employee transfer:<\/strong> Key personnel to Malta\/Ireland<\/li>\n<li><strong>System integration:<\/strong> IT, accounting, controlling<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Phase 5: Operational Stabilization (3-6 Months)<\/h3>\n<p>In the first months we optimize processes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Finalize intercompany agreements<\/li>\n<li>Create transfer pricing documentation<\/li>\n<li>Establish local compliance<\/li>\n<li>Set up reporting routines<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Phase 6: Monitoring &amp; Optimization (Ongoing)<\/h3>\n<p>A good structure needs continuous care:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Compliance monitoring:<\/strong> Quarterly checks of all requirements<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tax updates:<\/strong> Adjust for legal changes<\/li>\n<li><strong>Performance review:<\/strong> Annual efficiency assessment<\/li>\n<li><strong>Structure optimization:<\/strong> Adapt as business evolves<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"compliance-substance\">Compliance and Substance Requirements in Malta and Ireland<\/h2>\n<p>Let me be honest with you:<\/p>\n<p>The days of \u201cletterbox companies\u201d are over. Both countries now require real economic substance.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a good thing. Only then will your structure remain stable and recognized in the long-term.<\/p>\n<h3>Malta: Substance Requirements in Detail<\/h3>\n<p>Malta has considerably tightened its requirements in recent years:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Minimum capital:<\/strong> \u20ac1,165 is no longer enough\u2014\u20ac25,000+ is recommended<\/li>\n<li><strong>Local presence:<\/strong> Actual office with own infrastructure<\/li>\n<li><strong>Qualified persons:<\/strong> At least 2 qualified people on site<\/li>\n<li><strong>Board meetings:<\/strong> At least 50% of meetings in Malta<\/li>\n<li><strong>Core Income Generating Activities (CIGA):<\/strong> Value-added activities in Malta<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A practical example for Malta substance:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>My client with a Malta holding company employs a finance director and an accountant locally. This costs \u20ac120,000 per year but secures him \u20ac600,000 in tax savings on \u20ac2 million in dividends. ROI: 500%.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>Ireland: Higher Standards, Better Reputation<\/h3>\n<p>Ireland\u2019s substance requirements are much tougher:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Area<\/th>\n<th>Minimum<\/th>\n<th>Best Practice<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Local directors<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>Majority Irish tax resident<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>On-site staff<\/td>\n<td>1 (with simple structures)<\/td>\n<td>3-5 depending on activity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Office space<\/td>\n<td>Registered address<\/td>\n<td>Own office space<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Board meetings<\/td>\n<td>2 per year in Ireland<\/td>\n<td>Quarterly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business activity<\/td>\n<td>CIGA in Ireland<\/td>\n<td>Comprehensive value creation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>BEPS-Compliance: More Than Just a Buzzword<\/h3>\n<p>The OECD BEPS initiative (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) has changed the game. Especially Action 5 (harmful tax practices) and Action 6 (treaty shopping) are relevant:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Economic substance test:<\/strong> Your company must have genuine activity<\/li>\n<li><strong>Nexus test:<\/strong> IP income must be tied to local development<\/li>\n<li><strong>Principal purpose test:<\/strong> Tax advantages cannot be the main objective<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Practical Compliance Checklist<\/h3>\n<p>This is the checklist I use with every client:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Monthly:<\/strong> Local accounting and payroll<\/li>\n<li><strong>Quarterly:<\/strong> Document board minutes and decisions<\/li>\n<li><strong>Every six months:<\/strong> Update transfer pricing documentation<\/li>\n<li><strong>Annually:<\/strong> Review and adjust substance requirements<\/li>\n<li><strong>On changes:<\/strong> Assess tax implications<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2 id=\"kostenvergleich-roi\">Cost Comparison and ROI Calculation for Both Locations<\/h2>\n<p>Now we get to the most important part: What does all this really cost?<\/p>\n<p>And even more importantly: Is it worth it for your business?<\/p>\n<h3>Setup Costs Compared<\/h3>\n<p>Here are realistic figures for a professional structure:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cost item<\/th>\n<th>Malta<\/th>\n<th>Ireland<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Company formation<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac3,000\u20135,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac5,000\u20138,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Legal advice<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac10,000\u201315,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac15,000\u201325,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tax advice<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac15,000\u201325,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac20,000\u201335,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Bank account opening<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac2,000\u20133,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac3,000\u20135,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Building substance<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac20,000\u201340,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac40,000\u201380,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total setup<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u20ac50,000\u201388,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u20ac83,000\u2013153,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Annual Ongoing Costs<\/h3>\n<p>Ongoing costs are often more significant than the setup:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cost item<\/th>\n<th>Malta<\/th>\n<th>Ireland<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Local staff<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac80,000\u2013120,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac120,000\u2013200,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Office &amp; infrastructure<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac15,000\u201325,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac25,000\u201350,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Compliance &amp; accounting<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac20,000\u201330,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac30,000\u201350,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tax advice<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac25,000\u201340,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac35,000\u201360,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Legal advice<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac10,000\u201315,000<\/td>\n<td>\u20ac15,000\u201325,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total per year<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u20ac150,000\u2013230,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u20ac225,000\u2013385,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>ROI Calculation for Different Company Sizes<\/h3>\n<p>This is where it gets exciting. At what size does each location pay off?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Example 1: \u20ac10 million turnover, \u20ac1 million profit<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Germany:<\/strong> ~\u20ac300,000 tax<\/li>\n<li><strong>Malta:<\/strong> ~\u20ac50,000 tax + \u20ac180,000 costs = \u20ac230,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Savings:<\/strong> \u20ac70,000 per year<\/li>\n<li><strong>ROI:<\/strong> 35% in first year, 46% from year two<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Example 2: \u20ac20 million turnover, \u20ac3 million profit<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Germany:<\/strong> ~\u20ac900,000 tax<\/li>\n<li><strong>Malta:<\/strong> ~\u20ac150,000 tax + \u20ac200,000 costs = \u20ac350,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Savings:<\/strong> \u20ac550,000 per year<\/li>\n<li><strong>ROI:<\/strong> 275% in first year, 344% from year two<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Example 3: \u20ac50 million turnover, \u20ac8 million profit (IP-heavy)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Germany:<\/strong> ~\u20ac2,400,000 tax<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ireland (IP box):<\/strong> ~\u20ac500,000 tax + \u20ac300,000 costs = \u20ac800,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Savings:<\/strong> \u20ac1,600,000 per year<\/li>\n<li><strong>ROI:<\/strong> 533% in first year, 640% from year two<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Break-Even Analysis: When Does It Make Sense?<\/h3>\n<p>Based on my experience with over 200 structures:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Malta structure:<\/strong> Worth it from ~\u20ac800,000 annual profit<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ireland structure:<\/strong> Worth it from ~\u20ac1,500,000 annual profit<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hybrid structure:<\/strong> Worth it from ~\u20ac5,000,000 annual profit<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Hidden Costs and Risks<\/h3>\n<p>Be honest: There are hidden costs too:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Travel expenses:<\/strong> Regular trips for board meetings<\/li>\n<li><strong>Duplicated systems:<\/strong> IT, HR, compliance in several countries<\/li>\n<li><strong>Currency risks:<\/strong> For international structures<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compliance risks:<\/strong> Fines from mistakes can be expensive<\/li>\n<li><strong>Opportunity costs:<\/strong> Time for structure management<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Still: With proper planning and execution, tax savings usually far exceed all the associated costs.<\/p>\n<section>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions on Malta vs. Ireland EU Headquarters Strategies<\/h2>\n<h3>How long does it take to form a company in Malta vs. Ireland?<\/h3>\n<p>In Malta, company formation typically takes 3-4 weeks, while in Ireland it takes 4-6 weeks. The whole setup process including bank account and building substance takes 6-12 weeks in Malta, 8-16 weeks in Ireland. Ireland has stricter due diligence requirements, which lengthens the process.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the minimum substance required for Malta and Ireland?<\/h3>\n<p>Malta requires at least one qualified local employee, actual office premises and regular board meetings on site. Ireland sets higher standards: at least 2-3 qualified employees, own office space, and real business activity (CIGA) locally. For IP holdings in Ireland, the IP must also be developed locally (nexus test).<\/p>\n<h3>Can I move my existing German GmbH to Malta or Ireland?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, but it\u2019s more complex than a new formation. You can either carry out a seat transfer or move your activities to a new corporation. Note: Germany levies exit taxation on hidden reserves. The precise strategy depends on your business model and the hidden reserves involved.<\/p>\n<h3>How exactly does the 6\/7ths rule in Malta work?<\/h3>\n<p>Malta first levies 35% corporate tax. On dividend distributions to non-Maltese shareholders, you get back 6\/7 of the tax paid. On \u20ac100,000 profit you pay \u20ac35,000 tax, but get \u20ac30,000 back. Effective burden: 5%. Requirement: Dividends must actually be paid out.<\/p>\n<h3>What are the advantages of Ireland\u2019s IP box?<\/h3>\n<p>Ireland\u2019s Knowledge Development Box taxes qualified IP income at just 6.25% instead of 12.5%. Qualifying assets include self-developed patents, copyrights, and software. Important: The IP must pass the nexus test\u2014you must show the development actually took place in Ireland.<\/p>\n<h3>From what company size is an EU holding structure worthwhile?<\/h3>\n<p>Rule of thumb: Malta structures are worthwhile from \u20ac800,000 annual profit, Ireland from \u20ac1,500,000. For smaller profits, the substance costs (\u20ac150,000\u2013300,000 p.a.) often outweigh the tax savings. How you use profits also matters: Malta is optimal for dividends, Ireland for IP-based models.<\/p>\n<h3>What compliance risks exist with Malta and Ireland structures?<\/h3>\n<p>The biggest risks are lacking substance and transfer pricing issues. Both countries now strictly check whether there\u2019s real activity on site. Artificial structures risk tax consequences and reputation damage. You also need to comply with BEPS and anti-avoidance directives.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I combine Malta and Ireland in one structure?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, many of my large clients use hybrid structures: IP development and holding in Ireland (6.25% IP box), operating activities and dividends via Malta (5% due to 6\/7ths rule). This requires excellent planning of intercompany arrangements and transfer pricing documentation.<\/p>\n<h3>What is Germany\u2019s attitude towards Malta and Ireland structures?<\/h3>\n<p>Germany generally recognizes both locations as EU members. Important: You must prove real substance and maintain transfer pricing conformity. The German foreign tax act reform tightened requirements. Moving abroad also triggers exit tax.<\/p>\n<h3>What costs arise for a Malta vs. Ireland holding structure?<\/h3>\n<p>Setup costs: Malta \u20ac50,000\u201388,000, Ireland \u20ac83,000\u2013153,000. Annual running costs: Malta \u20ac150,000\u2013230,000, Ireland \u20ac225,000\u2013385,000. Higher costs in Ireland stem from stricter substance requirements and higher staff costs. In return, Ireland offers better international reputation and IP structures.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents Malta vs. Ireland: Which EU Location Suits Your Company? Malta as EU Headquarters: The 6\/7ths Rule and Other Tax Advantages Ireland: The Preferred EU Hub for Tech Giants and IP Holdings Holding Structures for Companies with 10+ Million Euro Turnover Practical Implementation: From Planning to Execution Compliance and Substance Requirements in Malta [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_tldr":"<ul>\n<li><strong>Malta gl\u00e4nzt bei Dividendenstrukturen:<\/strong> Die 6\/7ths-Regel reduziert die effektive Steuerbelastung auf 5% bei Dividendenaussch\u00fcttungen<\/li>\n<li><strong>Irland ist optimal f\u00fcr IP-Holdings:<\/strong> 6,25% Steuersatz in der Knowledge Development Box f\u00fcr qualifizierte IP-Ertr\u00e4ge<\/li>\n<li><strong>Substance-Anforderungen sind gestiegen:<\/strong> Beide L\u00e4nder verlangen echte wirtschaftliche Aktivit\u00e4t vor Ort<\/li>\n<li><strong>ROI ist beeindruckend:<\/strong> Malta lohnt sich ab 800.000\u20ac Gewinn, Irland ab 1.500.000\u20ac j\u00e4hrlich<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hybrid-Strukturen sind m\u00f6glich:<\/strong> Kombination beider Standorte f\u00fcr maximale Steueroptimierung<\/li>\n<li><strong>Setup-Kosten variieren stark:<\/strong> Malta 50.000-88.000\u20ac, Irland 83.000-153.000\u20ac initial<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compliance ist kritisch:<\/strong> BEPS-Regeln und Anti-Avoidance-Direktiven m\u00fcssen beachtet werden<\/li>\n<\/ul>","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nicht-kategorisiert"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Table of Contents Malta vs. Ireland: Which EU Location Suits Your Company? Malta as EU Headquarters: The 6\/7ths Rule and Other Tax Advantages Ireland: The Preferred EU Hub for Tech Giants and IP Holdings Holding Structures for Companies with 10+ Million Euro Turnover Practical Implementation: From Planning to Execution Compliance and Substance Requirements in Malta [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\"},\"headline\":\"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2629,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Nicht kategorisiert\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/\",\"name\":\"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/\",\"name\":\"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/meyer-stern.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","og_description":"Table of Contents Malta vs. Ireland: Which EU Location Suits Your Company? Malta as EU Headquarters: The 6\/7ths Rule and Other Tax Advantages Ireland: The Preferred EU Hub for Tech Giants and IP Holdings Holding Structures for Companies with 10+ Million Euro Turnover Practical Implementation: From Planning to Execution Compliance and Substance Requirements in Malta [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/","og_site_name":"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","article_published_time":"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"admin","Tiempo de lectura":"13 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239"},"headline":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million","datePublished":"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/"},"wordCount":2629,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Nicht kategorisiert"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/","url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/","name":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million - Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-27T19:15:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/malta-vs-ireland-eu-headquarters-strategies-for-medium-sized-companies-with-revenues-over-10-million\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Malta vs. Ireland: EU headquarters strategies for medium-sized companies with revenues over 10 million"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/#website","url":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/","name":"Marcus Meyer-Stern - International Tax","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/f79a3337d6dca55421673c5064a48239","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea2f959fe97be2276f91ff1109fce308bd83dc9f99f2765295039483c76a6562?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/meyer-stern.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=954"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meyer-stern.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}